In a recent turn of events, Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Limited (SNGPL) has firmly denied the defamation allegations brought forth by Jazz, one of Pakistan’s leading telecommunications giants. SNGPL not only refutes these claims but has demanded compensation from the telco titan for what it perceives as unjust accusations.
The Baseless Defamation Claim
SNGPL’s stance on Jazz’s defamation claim is crystal clear. The gas company asserts that it has been providing electricity to a mobile tower located at the Karak site in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa through the use of natural gas. They categorically label Jazz’s allegations as baseless and emphasize their unwavering commitment to ethical business practices.
The Raid and Gas-Powered Tower
In a press statement, SNGPL underscores that its team, in collaboration with law enforcement agencies, conducted a comprehensive inspection of Jazz’s mobile tower in Karak. The findings indicated that the diesel generators at the tower were non-operational, and the tower was, in fact, powered by natural gas. This revelation reinforces SNGPL’s position that they were merely fulfilling their role in providing a legitimate service.
Having been falsely accused of gas theft, SNGPL has taken swift action. They have issued a recovery notice amounting to Rs. 3.7 million to Jazz, citing damage to their network infrastructure and the national treasury. SNGPL asserts its right to pursue legal action should Jazz fail to meet this financial obligation. The company’s resolute stance is clear: it will not tolerate any harm to national resources.
The Defamation Notice from Jazz
In response to Jazz’s allegations, SNGPL remains steadfast. Jazz, Pakistan’s largest digital operator, slapped SNGPL with a hefty Rs. 10 billion defamation notice. They contend that SNGPL’s claims of gas theft are not only unfounded but also detrimental to their reputation.
Jazz’s position on this matter is unequivocal. They maintain that none of their network sites across the country utilize natural gas, a fact they claim is substantiated by photographic evidence of a diesel generator shared by SNGPL on social media. Jazz characterizes the gas theft accusations as frivolous and without merit. Moreover, they stress the significance of their contribution to the national economy and argue that baseless allegations of this nature can erode investor confidence, potentially harming the country’s economy.
In conclusion, the dispute between SNGPL and Jazz over defamation claims and allegations of gas theft continues to escalate. Both parties stand firm in their positions, with SNGPL demanding compensation for what they perceive as unjust allegations, and Jazz vehemently defending its reputation and economic contributions. The outcome of this ongoing battle remains uncertain, but it underscores the importance of transparency, ethical conduct, and responsible communication in the business world.