The Lahore High Court (LHC) has overturned the death sentences in two separate blasphemy cases, citing a lack of concrete evidence and procedural lapses.
In the first case, the court acquitted Aneeqa Atiq, who had been previously sentenced to death following her conviction under blasphemy laws. The Rawalpindi bench ruled that the prosecution failed to present sufficient forensic proof, noting that neither her mobile phone nor the complainant’s phone was properly examined. The bench also pointed out that there was no established personal or lawful connection between Aneeqa and the complainant, raising serious doubts about the validity of the accusations.
Lahore High Court overturns blasphemy death sentences in two major cases due to lack of forensic proof and procedural flaws
Read More:
Pakistani Rapper Talha Anjum Sparks Controversy for Waving Indian Flag During Nepal Concert
In a second case, Sajid Ali, who was on death row for alleged blasphemy, was also acquitted by the LHC. The court scrutinized the prosecution’s case and found it lacking: it highlighted contradictory witness statements and noted that key evidence was missing or weak.
Major Relief as LHC Sets Aside Blasphemy Death Sentences Due to Procedural Flaws
These decisions have reignited debate around Pakistan’s blasphemy laws, with legal experts arguing that such cases often rely heavily on weak or unverified evidence. Critics say these verdicts underline the urgent need for strict evidentiary standards and better procedural safeguards in blasphemy prosecutions.
