The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has issued a critical governance and corruption assessment highlighting deep structural weaknesses in Pakistan’s anti-corruption system. The report warns that selective accountability, political interference, and unchecked institutional powers have severely damaged public trust and undermined government efficiency.
According to the IMF, Pakistan’s top anti-graft agency, the National Accountability Bureau (NAB), has “at times exceeded its mandate,” pursuing politically influenced cases and exercising broad powers without sufficient oversight. These practices, the report states, have weakened NAB’s credibility and fostered the public perception that corruption is unavoidable in a system long plagued by excessive bureaucracy and administrative bottlenecks.
A 2024 government Task Force report, referenced by the IMF, also revealed that senior officials often avoid using routine administrative discretion due to fear of NAB’s overreach and selective investigations. This hesitation has negatively impacted government performance and slowed decision-making across departments.
Despite systemic issues, the IMF acknowledged that Pakistan has historically recognized corruption as a major national challenge. Pakistan’s anti-corruption framework dates back to the 1947 Prevention of Corruption Act, supplemented over decades by institutions such as NAB, the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), and provincial Anti-Corruption Establishments.
Recent high-profile convictions and asset recoveries—amounting to approximately Rs. 5.31 trillion between January 2023 and December 2024—show that accountability efforts can reach top-tier officials.
READ MORE: HEC Reschedules Law Admission Test for Balochistan Candidates to November 30
However, the IMF noted that Pakistan still trails behind its regional counterparts in effectively controlling corruption. Rent-seeking behavior, bribery, and patronage networks continue to distort governance and create risks for macroeconomic stability.
A major structural weakness highlighted in the report is the absence of a national whistleblower protection system. Except for Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, which introduced such a law in 2016, Pakistan lacks institutional safeguards for individuals who expose corruption. Previous federal attempts failed in 2019, but a new bill introduced in parliament in April 2025 proposes establishing an independent Whistleblower Protection and Vigilance Commission.
The IMF stressed that such protections are essential in a system where whistleblowers risk retaliation, harassment, or career harm due to entrenched patronage networks.
Transparency also remains a persistent challenge. While the 2017 Right to Information Act strengthened legal access to public records, implementation is inconsistent. Many government agencies frequently delay or deny information requests, often citing broad exemptions.
From 2022 to 2024, most appeals to the Pakistan Information Commission stemmed from requests submitted to major entities such as the Capital Development Authority (CDA), NADRA, the Interior Ministry, NAB, FIA, and the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR).
The IMF urged Pakistan to make proactive disclosures of key government data—including budgets, expenditures, and procurement contracts—and improve institutional responsiveness to information requests. These reforms, the report emphasized, are vital for strengthening transparency, promoting civic oversight, and rebuilding public trust in state institutions.
